https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297753 Continuing correspondence over dissolution of a partnership and settlement of accounts can keep an arbitration claim live for Section 11 purposes, and acknowledgments of liability in that correspondence may extend limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The Delhi HC also noted that a further formal notice for mutual appointment of a sole arbitrator was unnecessary where one party had already sought appointment, sent reminders, and the other side remained unresponsive. On that basis, the arbitration application was allowed and a sole arbitrator was appointed to decide the claims and counter-claims. en-us Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Sep 2021 10:45:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297753 Continuing correspondence over dissolution of a partnership and settlement of accounts can keep an arbitration claim live for Section 11 purposes, and acknowledgments of liability in that correspondence may extend limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The Delhi HC also noted that a further formal notice for mutual appointment of a sole arbitrator was unnecessary where one party had already sought appointment, sent reminders, and the other side remained unresponsive. On that basis, the arbitration application was allowed and a sole arbitrator was appointed to decide the claims and counter-claims. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297753