<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 903 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412558</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the respondent authority to consider and dispose of the petitioners&#039; representation within a specified timeline, emphasizing the need for timely resolution. The court did not delve into the merits of the claim but instructed strict adherence to the law. The judgment aimed to address the delay in handling the petitioners&#039; grievance and incorporated relevant judgments from the Delhi High Court and Calcutta High Court cited by the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 11:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 903 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412558</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the respondent authority to consider and dispose of the petitioners&#039; representation within a specified timeline, emphasizing the need for timely resolution. The court did not delve into the merits of the claim but instructed strict adherence to the law. The judgment aimed to address the delay in handling the petitioners&#039; grievance and incorporated relevant judgments from the Delhi High Court and Calcutta High Court cited by the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>