<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 895 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412550</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on the addition under section 68 and disallowance under section 69C of the Income Tax Act. However, the disallowance under section 14A was upheld. The Tribunal found no error in the Commissioner&#039;s decision regarding the disallowance under section 14A, as the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to contest it. The Tribunal set aside the addition under section 68 as the loan was taken in a previous financial year. Additionally, the Tribunal concluded that no disallowance was warranted under section 69C due to the deletion of the cash credit addition under section 68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2021 08:25:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 895 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412550</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on the addition under section 68 and disallowance under section 69C of the Income Tax Act. However, the disallowance under section 14A was upheld. The Tribunal found no error in the Commissioner&#039;s decision regarding the disallowance under section 14A, as the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to contest it. The Tribunal set aside the addition under section 68 as the loan was taken in a previous financial year. Additionally, the Tribunal concluded that no disallowance was warranted under section 69C due to the deletion of the cash credit addition under section 68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>