<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1919 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297739</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the respondent&#039;s compliance with the law regarding availing Cenvat credit on input services for both exempted and dutiable goods. The respondent voluntarily determined and paid back the appropriate credit for exempted goods, following Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Citing a precedent case, the Tribunal found no merit in the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the impugned order and setting aside the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2021 08:23:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1919 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297739</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the respondent&#039;s compliance with the law regarding availing Cenvat credit on input services for both exempted and dutiable goods. The respondent voluntarily determined and paid back the appropriate credit for exempted goods, following Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Citing a precedent case, the Tribunal found no merit in the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the impugned order and setting aside the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>