https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297743 The Court declined to entertain the writ petition challenging the provisional attachment order, emphasizing the petitioner's right to challenge it before the Adjudicating Authority. The Court noted the previous dismissal of the petitioner's attempt to quash the FIR and highlighted that innocence cannot be determined until the investigation concludes. The writ petition was disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to seek relief through statutory remedies before the Adjudicating Authority, without expressing any opinion on the merits. No costs were awarded, and the miscellaneous petition was closed. en-us Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Sep 2021 08:23:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297743 The Court declined to entertain the writ petition challenging the provisional attachment order, emphasizing the petitioner's right to challenge it before the Adjudicating Authority. The Court noted the previous dismissal of the petitioner's attempt to quash the FIR and highlighted that innocence cannot be determined until the investigation concludes. The writ petition was disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to seek relief through statutory remedies before the Adjudicating Authority, without expressing any opinion on the merits. No costs were awarded, and the miscellaneous petition was closed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297743