<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (1) TMI 58 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26630</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the loss of Rs. 42,000 was a trading loss, not a speculation loss. The payment was deemed an allowable deduction under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, as it was for the business&#039;s benefit. The Court also determined that the transactions did not qualify as speculative under section 43(5). The ruling favored the assessee, directing each party to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 14:10:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (1) TMI 58 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26630</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the loss of Rs. 42,000 was a trading loss, not a speculation loss. The payment was deemed an allowable deduction under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, as it was for the business&#039;s benefit. The Court also determined that the transactions did not qualify as speculative under section 43(5). The ruling favored the assessee, directing each party to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>