https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297733 Writ jurisdiction was held inappropriate against a preliminary provident fund direction to produce records, because no final determination had yet been made by the competent authority. The question whether the payment formed part of basic wages was treated as a mixed question of law and fact requiring adjudication on the statutory record. Where the provident fund framework provides determination, review and appeal remedies, the party must ordinarily exhaust that complete mechanism before approaching the High Court under Article 226. The employer was therefore required to cooperate with the pending statutory proceedings rather than seek to halt them through writ relief. en-us Tue, 07 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Sep 2021 16:56:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297733 Writ jurisdiction was held inappropriate against a preliminary provident fund direction to produce records, because no final determination had yet been made by the competent authority. The question whether the payment formed part of basic wages was treated as a mixed question of law and fact requiring adjudication on the statutory record. Where the provident fund framework provides determination, review and appeal remedies, the party must ordinarily exhaust that complete mechanism before approaching the High Court under Article 226. The employer was therefore required to cooperate with the pending statutory proceedings rather than seek to halt them through writ relief. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297733