<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1223 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297731</link>
    <description>The real relief disclosed by the plaint determines court fee, not the label used by the plaintiff. Where an executant of a registered sale deed alleges non-payment of full consideration and fraud, but the deed records receipt of consideration and delivery of possession, the claim is in substance one for cancellation, not a mere declaration. A declaratory suit is maintainable only if the deed is void ab initio or expressly makes non-payment or dishonour of cheques a ground for automatic revocation. As the sale transaction was complete and no such stipulation existed, annulment was the proper remedy and ad valorem court fee was payable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 16:11:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1223 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297731</link>
      <description>The real relief disclosed by the plaint determines court fee, not the label used by the plaintiff. Where an executant of a registered sale deed alleges non-payment of full consideration and fraud, but the deed records receipt of consideration and delivery of possession, the claim is in substance one for cancellation, not a mere declaration. A declaratory suit is maintainable only if the deed is void ab initio or expressly makes non-payment or dishonour of cheques a ground for automatic revocation. As the sale transaction was complete and no such stipulation existed, annulment was the proper remedy and ad valorem court fee was payable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>