<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 381 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297729</link>
    <description>Fixation of pay scales and equation of posts are primarily executive functions, and writ interference is justified only where the pay structure is demonstrably arbitrary or irrational. Gazetted status, inclusion in State Service, or higher educational qualifications do not by themselves require parity with higher services when duties, responsibilities, recruitment level, promotion avenues, and service relativities differ. On that reasoning, Sub-Registrars were not entitled to be placed in the same higher scale as Munsiffs or Judicial Officers, because their functions were materially different. The State&#039;s pay fixation was restored, while the Government was directed to reconsider the appropriate scale for Sub-Registrars by a speaking order after hearing the employee association.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 12:07:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 381 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297729</link>
      <description>Fixation of pay scales and equation of posts are primarily executive functions, and writ interference is justified only where the pay structure is demonstrably arbitrary or irrational. Gazetted status, inclusion in State Service, or higher educational qualifications do not by themselves require parity with higher services when duties, responsibilities, recruitment level, promotion avenues, and service relativities differ. On that reasoning, Sub-Registrars were not entitled to be placed in the same higher scale as Munsiffs or Judicial Officers, because their functions were materially different. The State&#039;s pay fixation was restored, while the Government was directed to reconsider the appropriate scale for Sub-Registrars by a speaking order after hearing the employee association.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>