<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (9) TMI 66 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26627</link>
    <description>On retirement from a partnership, a partner is not automatically treated as making a taxable gift of goodwill to the incoming or continuing partners. The Gift-tax Act definitions of &quot;gift&quot;, &quot;transfer of property&quot;, and the deeming rule for release, surrender or abandonment of an interest were considered, but tax liability depended on proof that the firm had positive goodwill capable of transfer and that the retiring partner in fact relinquished that interest. On the material before it, there was no adequate proof of existing goodwill, no valuation showing assets including goodwill exceeded liabilities, and no document establishing a relinquishment in favour of the other partners. No deemed gift was therefore made out on those facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 13:59:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (9) TMI 66 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26627</link>
      <description>On retirement from a partnership, a partner is not automatically treated as making a taxable gift of goodwill to the incoming or continuing partners. The Gift-tax Act definitions of &quot;gift&quot;, &quot;transfer of property&quot;, and the deeming rule for release, surrender or abandonment of an interest were considered, but tax liability depended on proof that the firm had positive goodwill capable of transfer and that the retiring partner in fact relinquished that interest. On the material before it, there was no adequate proof of existing goodwill, no valuation showing assets including goodwill exceeded liabilities, and no document establishing a relinquishment in favour of the other partners. No deemed gift was therefore made out on those facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>