<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 864 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412519</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to a GST show cause notice was not entertained because the petitioner had already filed a reply and the matter was pending before the competent authority. The Court, however, noted the objection that the audit report was not supplied within 30 days as contemplated under Section 65(6) of the GST Act. It directed the authority to examine that objection along with the reply and then decide the show cause notice by a reasoned speaking order in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 11:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 864 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412519</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to a GST show cause notice was not entertained because the petitioner had already filed a reply and the matter was pending before the competent authority. The Court, however, noted the objection that the audit report was not supplied within 30 days as contemplated under Section 65(6) of the GST Act. It directed the authority to examine that objection along with the reply and then decide the show cause notice by a reasoned speaking order in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>