https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412517 The High Court of Karnataka allowed the writ petition partially, directing the immediate release of goods and conveyance to the petitioner upon depositing the total amount mentioned in the Sec.130 notice. The court emphasized the owner's right to seek redemption even after confiscation and highlighted the procedural requirements for release based on relevant circulars and statutory provisions. The judgment clarified the legal provisions regarding the release of goods pending confiscation proceedings under the CGST Act, stressing the option for redemption of confiscated goods and conveyances by paying a fine. en-us Wed, 25 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Mar 2025 12:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412517 The High Court of Karnataka allowed the writ petition partially, directing the immediate release of goods and conveyance to the petitioner upon depositing the total amount mentioned in the Sec.130 notice. The court emphasized the owner's right to seek redemption even after confiscation and highlighted the procedural requirements for release based on relevant circulars and statutory provisions. The judgment clarified the legal provisions regarding the release of goods pending confiscation proceedings under the CGST Act, stressing the option for redemption of confiscated goods and conveyances by paying a fine. Case-Laws GST Wed, 25 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412517