<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 855 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412510</link>
    <description>Rule 6(3)(b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 applies only where common inputs are used to make both dutiable and exempted final products, or goods chargeable to nil duty. Clearance of dissolved acetylene gas to a specified buyer without duty under Notification No. 82/84-CE, after following the prescribed concessional removal procedure, was treated as a clearance of the same excisable product under a remission or exemption mechanism, not as a separate exempted final product. Because the assessee manufactured only one product and no distinct exempted product existed, the condition for reversing credit under Rule 6 was absent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 855 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412510</link>
      <description>Rule 6(3)(b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 applies only where common inputs are used to make both dutiable and exempted final products, or goods chargeable to nil duty. Clearance of dissolved acetylene gas to a specified buyer without duty under Notification No. 82/84-CE, after following the prescribed concessional removal procedure, was treated as a clearance of the same excisable product under a remission or exemption mechanism, not as a separate exempted final product. Because the assessee manufactured only one product and no distinct exempted product existed, the condition for reversing credit under Rule 6 was absent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>