<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (10) TMI 8 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26623</link>
    <description>The court held that the Tribunal erred in excluding the value of 10 shares transferred by the assessee to his wife. The court found the valuation inadequate and determined that the difference should be included in the assessee&#039;s net wealth. The decision favored the Revenue, directing them to bear their own costs due to peculiar circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 13:50:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (10) TMI 8 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26623</link>
      <description>The court held that the Tribunal erred in excluding the value of 10 shares transferred by the assessee to his wife. The court found the valuation inadequate and determined that the difference should be included in the assessee&#039;s net wealth. The decision favored the Revenue, directing them to bear their own costs due to peculiar circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>