<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 845 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412500</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision due to overlooking critical aspects and ordered a fresh decision. The CIT(A) was directed to verify the authenticity of invoices, examine records, and consider evidence, emphasizing unbiased assessment. The appeal of the revenue and the cross-objection of the assessee were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 09:20:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 845 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412500</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision due to overlooking critical aspects and ordered a fresh decision. The CIT(A) was directed to verify the authenticity of invoices, examine records, and consider evidence, emphasizing unbiased assessment. The appeal of the revenue and the cross-objection of the assessee were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>