<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 838 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412493</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed on estimated income concerning profit from bogus purchases. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal concluded that penalties were unwarranted in cases of estimations without concrete evidence of falsity. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the penalty deletion order by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 09:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 838 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412493</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed on estimated income concerning profit from bogus purchases. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal concluded that penalties were unwarranted in cases of estimations without concrete evidence of falsity. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the penalty deletion order by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>