<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1317 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297713</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. The invocation of Section 263 by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax was quashed, and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had conducted a detailed inquiry during the assessment proceedings, considering various aspects highlighted by the Pr. CIT, and had made reasoned decisions on each issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2021 22:12:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1317 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297713</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. The invocation of Section 263 by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax was quashed, and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had conducted a detailed inquiry during the assessment proceedings, considering various aspects highlighted by the Pr. CIT, and had made reasoned decisions on each issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>