https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297719 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned order, and held that the appellant was entitled to consequential benefits in accordance with law. The appellant had sufficiently established the receipt of inputs along with duty-paying documents, and the Department's reliance on third-party statements without cross-examination was deemed insufficient to prove the allegations. en-us Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 19 Sep 2021 22:12:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297719 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned order, and held that the appellant was entitled to consequential benefits in accordance with law. The appellant had sufficiently established the receipt of inputs along with duty-paying documents, and the Department's reliance on third-party statements without cross-examination was deemed insufficient to prove the allegations. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297719