<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1204 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297726</link>
    <description>For section 14A read with Rule 8D, disallowance cannot exceed the exempt dividend income actually earned in the year, so the adjustment was confined to that amount. Derivative loss and share trading results of a share broker engaged in a composite business were not to be mechanically treated as speculative loss under section 73, as derivatives within the statutory exception under section 43(5) are not speculative and business results must be aggregated before applying the deeming fiction. Employees&#039; contribution to provident fund paid before the return-filing due date was not disallowable under section 36(1)(va) read with section 2(24)(x), following binding precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2021 22:12:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1204 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297726</link>
      <description>For section 14A read with Rule 8D, disallowance cannot exceed the exempt dividend income actually earned in the year, so the adjustment was confined to that amount. Derivative loss and share trading results of a share broker engaged in a composite business were not to be mechanically treated as speculative loss under section 73, as derivatives within the statutory exception under section 43(5) are not speculative and business results must be aggregated before applying the deeming fiction. Employees&#039; contribution to provident fund paid before the return-filing due date was not disallowable under section 36(1)(va) read with section 2(24)(x), following binding precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>