<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 996 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297727</link>
    <description>Interim release of seized goods was directed on the petitioner furnishing a surety bond of equivalent value, and the petitioner was not required to provide a bank guarantee. The order reflects that, for temporary release of the goods pending the writ proceedings, a surety bond was accepted as sufficient security in place of a bank guarantee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 996 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297727</link>
      <description>Interim release of seized goods was directed on the petitioner furnishing a surety bond of equivalent value, and the petitioner was not required to provide a bank guarantee. The order reflects that, for temporary release of the goods pending the writ proceedings, a surety bond was accepted as sufficient security in place of a bank guarantee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>