<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (3) TMI 72 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26616</link>
    <description>Deductibility under section 5(1)(k) depends on expenditure being wholly and exclusively laid out for deriving agricultural income, so temple poojari salary, pooja expenses, stock exchange listing fees, and refreshments for visiting officials were not allowable because no direct nexus with agricultural income was shown. Auditor&#039;s fees for tax matters and certification work, teachers&#039; salary at the estate school, and profession tax were treated as deductible, the latter as a statutory liability. Donations to the Cyclone Relief Fund and the Admar Mutt Education Council were also allowable under section 12(g) because they were supported by receipts and covered by relevant Government notifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 13:20:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (3) TMI 72 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26616</link>
      <description>Deductibility under section 5(1)(k) depends on expenditure being wholly and exclusively laid out for deriving agricultural income, so temple poojari salary, pooja expenses, stock exchange listing fees, and refreshments for visiting officials were not allowable because no direct nexus with agricultural income was shown. Auditor&#039;s fees for tax matters and certification work, teachers&#039; salary at the estate school, and profession tax were treated as deductible, the latter as a statutory liability. Donations to the Cyclone Relief Fund and the Admar Mutt Education Council were also allowable under section 12(g) because they were supported by receipts and covered by relevant Government notifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>