<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 818 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412473</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC stayed the operation of a penalty order under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal was admitted, and a substantial question of law was framed. The applicant paid the penalty, and no pending demand existed. The court deemed it appropriate to stay the order pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 18:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 818 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412473</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC stayed the operation of a penalty order under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal was admitted, and a substantial question of law was framed. The applicant paid the penalty, and no pending demand existed. The court deemed it appropriate to stay the order pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>