<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (8) TMI 46 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26613</link>
    <description>Section 5(1)(viii) of the Gift-tax Act was held not to cover a gift made by a karta of a Hindu undivided family out of family funds to his wife. The Karnataka HC applied strict construction of exemption provisions in a taxing statute and held that the spouse exemption is confined to gifts between living spouses in their individual capacity. Because a karta acts in a representative capacity when dealing with HUF property, the gift was not treated as one made by an individual spouse within the exemption clause. The Tribunal&#039;s view allowing exemption was set aside and the question was answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 13:12:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (8) TMI 46 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26613</link>
      <description>Section 5(1)(viii) of the Gift-tax Act was held not to cover a gift made by a karta of a Hindu undivided family out of family funds to his wife. The Karnataka HC applied strict construction of exemption provisions in a taxing statute and held that the spouse exemption is confined to gifts between living spouses in their individual capacity. Because a karta acts in a representative capacity when dealing with HUF property, the gift was not treated as one made by an individual spouse within the exemption clause. The Tribunal&#039;s view allowing exemption was set aside and the question was answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>