<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 787 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412442</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Resolution Professional failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish the transactions as fraudulent, leading to the rejection of the application. The respondents were not obligated to contribute to the assets of the Corporate Debtor under Section 66 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2021 08:09:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 787 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412442</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Resolution Professional failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish the transactions as fraudulent, leading to the rejection of the application. The respondents were not obligated to contribute to the assets of the Corporate Debtor under Section 66 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>