<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1850 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297690</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision, limiting the deduction under section 54F to the land purchased from Mr. Y.J. Alex. The Tribunal found that the assessee&#039;s intention was to develop a resort, supported by the application for constructing a resort and subsequent building permit. Different individuals sold the properties, with multiple buildings indicating a commercial venture rather than a single residential unit. The Tribunal held that each transaction should be assessed independently, ruling against treating the properties as contiguous for the section 54F deduction. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was successful, overturning the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2021 08:09:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1850 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297690</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision, limiting the deduction under section 54F to the land purchased from Mr. Y.J. Alex. The Tribunal found that the assessee&#039;s intention was to develop a resort, supported by the application for constructing a resort and subsequent building permit. Different individuals sold the properties, with multiple buildings indicating a commercial venture rather than a single residential unit. The Tribunal held that each transaction should be assessed independently, ruling against treating the properties as contiguous for the section 54F deduction. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was successful, overturning the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>