https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297698 The Tribunal disposed of the application for injunction, emphasizing that the petitioner should seek further directions from the NCLAT as the admission order of the company petition was not final. The respondents were expected to maintain the status quo regarding the IRP proceedings, with no interim orders deemed necessary at that time. The application was disposed of with observations, directing the petitioner to approach the NCLAT for additional directions. en-us Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Sep 2021 08:09:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297698 The Tribunal disposed of the application for injunction, emphasizing that the petitioner should seek further directions from the NCLAT as the admission order of the company petition was not final. The respondents were expected to maintain the status quo regarding the IRP proceedings, with no interim orders deemed necessary at that time. The application was disposed of with observations, directing the petitioner to approach the NCLAT for additional directions. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297698