https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297696 The appellant's lack of diligence in pursuing the appeal, the disallowance of cenvat credit for exceeding the prescribed time limit, and the interpretation of the Notification dated 1st September, 2014 were key issues in the case. Despite the appellant's attempts to challenge these decisions, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s rulings, ultimately dismissing the appeal. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and statutory timelines in availing tax credits, leading to the unfavorable outcome for the appellant. en-us Thu, 26 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Sep 2021 08:09:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297696 The appellant's lack of diligence in pursuing the appeal, the disallowance of cenvat credit for exceeding the prescribed time limit, and the interpretation of the Notification dated 1st September, 2014 were key issues in the case. Despite the appellant's attempts to challenge these decisions, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s rulings, ultimately dismissing the appeal. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and statutory timelines in availing tax credits, leading to the unfavorable outcome for the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 26 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297696