<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1586 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297695</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty under Section 11AC of the Act. The respondent voluntarily paid the differential duty with interest before the show cause notice was issued, and there was no evidence of fraud or misrepresentation. The Tribunal found the situation to be Revenue neutral and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s challenge, disposing of the miscellaneous application accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2021 08:09:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1586 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297695</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty under Section 11AC of the Act. The respondent voluntarily paid the differential duty with interest before the show cause notice was issued, and there was no evidence of fraud or misrepresentation. The Tribunal found the situation to be Revenue neutral and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s challenge, disposing of the miscellaneous application accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>