<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 786 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412441</link>
    <description>The High Court found a violation of natural justice in an adjudication order based on a CRCL report without providing the petitioner an opportunity to object. The Court noted that the petitioner&#039;s objections were not considered in the order, as they were not given the complete CRCL report until after the hearing had commenced. Despite submitting objections later, they were not addressed by the adjudicating authority. Consequently, the Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the order and remitting the matter for a fresh decision, directing the authority to provide the petitioner with the complete report and allowing time for a detailed reply to ensure compliance with due process and natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 786 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412441</link>
      <description>The High Court found a violation of natural justice in an adjudication order based on a CRCL report without providing the petitioner an opportunity to object. The Court noted that the petitioner&#039;s objections were not considered in the order, as they were not given the complete CRCL report until after the hearing had commenced. Despite submitting objections later, they were not addressed by the adjudicating authority. Consequently, the Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the order and remitting the matter for a fresh decision, directing the authority to provide the petitioner with the complete report and allowing time for a detailed reply to ensure compliance with due process and natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>