<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (8) TMI 38 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26605</link>
    <description>The court ruled against the assessee, a private limited company engaged in building construction, determining that its activities did not qualify as manufacturing or processing goods under the Finance Acts of 1971 and 1972. As the company&#039;s income did not meet the requirement of deriving at least 51% from manufacturing processes, it was not considered an &quot;industrial company&quot; eligible for concessional tax rates. The court sided with the Department, leaving each party to bear their own costs due to the complexity of the issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (8) TMI 38 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26605</link>
      <description>The court ruled against the assessee, a private limited company engaged in building construction, determining that its activities did not qualify as manufacturing or processing goods under the Finance Acts of 1971 and 1972. As the company&#039;s income did not meet the requirement of deriving at least 51% from manufacturing processes, it was not considered an &quot;industrial company&quot; eligible for concessional tax rates. The court sided with the Department, leaving each party to bear their own costs due to the complexity of the issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>