<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 779 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412434</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the petitioner to send a representation to the respondents regarding the delayed payments under the SVLDRS due to COVID-19 impact. The court clarified that its order does not influence the decision on the representation, emphasizing that it will be considered independently. The court closed the petition without imposing costs, maintaining neutrality on the case merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 15:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 779 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412434</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the petitioner to send a representation to the respondents regarding the delayed payments under the SVLDRS due to COVID-19 impact. The court clarified that its order does not influence the decision on the representation, emphasizing that it will be considered independently. The court closed the petition without imposing costs, maintaining neutrality on the case merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>