https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412431 The Court directed respondent Nos. 2 and 4 to decide the pending representation of the petitioner regarding the blocked electronic credit ledger by a specified date, emphasizing the need for prompt action in accordance with the relevant rules. The petitioner was allowed to seek damages from the respondents for the prolonged blocking of the ledger, with the Court refraining from expressing any opinion on the potential damages claim but providing the petitioner the opportunity to pursue this remedy. en-us Wed, 25 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Mar 2025 12:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412431 The Court directed respondent Nos. 2 and 4 to decide the pending representation of the petitioner regarding the blocked electronic credit ledger by a specified date, emphasizing the need for prompt action in accordance with the relevant rules. The petitioner was allowed to seek damages from the respondents for the prolonged blocking of the ledger, with the Court refraining from expressing any opinion on the potential damages claim but providing the petitioner the opportunity to pursue this remedy. Case-Laws GST Wed, 25 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412431