https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412394 The Tribunal addressed compliance with an earlier order for affidavit-in-reply and the interpretation of OTS settlement terms. A discrepancy in the settlement amount claimed by the Petitioner and offered by the Respondent led to the necessity of additional documents for adjudication. ICICI Bank and Standard Chartered Bank were directed to provide clarifications, with senior officials and counsels required to appear. The parties were urged to consider settlement possibilities, and a final hearing was scheduled to expedite the resolution of the long-pending matter. en-us Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Sep 2021 09:20:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412394 The Tribunal addressed compliance with an earlier order for affidavit-in-reply and the interpretation of OTS settlement terms. A discrepancy in the settlement amount claimed by the Petitioner and offered by the Respondent led to the necessity of additional documents for adjudication. ICICI Bank and Standard Chartered Bank were directed to provide clarifications, with senior officials and counsels required to appear. The parties were urged to consider settlement possibilities, and a final hearing was scheduled to expedite the resolution of the long-pending matter. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412394