<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1398 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297673</link>
    <description>A fresh writ petition based on the same complaints and substantially the same reliefs was declined under Article 226 because earlier writ proceedings on the same factual foundation had already been disposed of and were under appeal. The addition of a constitutional challenge to the investigation rules did not change the real character of the relief sought, which remained directed to the same dispute. The Court treated the filing as re-litigation, emphasising that repeated petitions on the same matter create multiplicity of proceedings and waste judicial time. The petition was therefore not entertained and was dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 09:20:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1398 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297673</link>
      <description>A fresh writ petition based on the same complaints and substantially the same reliefs was declined under Article 226 because earlier writ proceedings on the same factual foundation had already been disposed of and were under appeal. The addition of a constitutional challenge to the investigation rules did not change the real character of the relief sought, which remained directed to the same dispute. The Court treated the filing as re-litigation, emphasising that repeated petitions on the same matter create multiplicity of proceedings and waste judicial time. The petition was therefore not entertained and was dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>