<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (3) TMI 70 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26599</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the Explanation thereto was not justified. The court found that the assessee had successfully discharged the initial burden of proof, and the Revenue failed to establish concealment of income. Consequently, the penalty was cancelled, and the court&#039;s decision favored the assessee against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 12:44:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (3) TMI 70 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26599</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the Explanation thereto was not justified. The court found that the assessee had successfully discharged the initial burden of proof, and the Revenue failed to establish concealment of income. Consequently, the penalty was cancelled, and the court&#039;s decision favored the assessee against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>