https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297682 The court granted the petitioner time to seek instructions and scheduled further proceedings related to a writ petition challenging a provisional attachment order. The petitioner argued the order contradicted a Supreme Court decision and sought a stay to operate bank accounts for business purposes. Respondents defended the attachment order citing allegations of GST evasion amounting to Rs. 5.9 crores on passenger transport services to protect revenue interests. Further proceedings were set for May 12, 2021. en-us Wed, 05 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Mar 2025 12:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297682 The court granted the petitioner time to seek instructions and scheduled further proceedings related to a writ petition challenging a provisional attachment order. The petitioner argued the order contradicted a Supreme Court decision and sought a stay to operate bank accounts for business purposes. Respondents defended the attachment order citing allegations of GST evasion amounting to Rs. 5.9 crores on passenger transport services to protect revenue interests. Further proceedings were set for May 12, 2021. Case-Laws GST Wed, 05 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297682