https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297665 The court decreed specific performance in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendant to execute the necessary agreement and hand over possession of the shop, subject to the payment of interest on delayed installments. The plaintiff was also awarded the costs of the suit. The court dismissed the defendant's application under Order VII, Rule 11, and rendered other applications infructuous. The question of execution under the Delhi Apartments Ownership Act, 1986, was left open as it was not urged by the plaintiff. en-us Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Sep 2021 18:14:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297665 The court decreed specific performance in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendant to execute the necessary agreement and hand over possession of the shop, subject to the payment of interest on delayed installments. The plaintiff was also awarded the costs of the suit. The court dismissed the defendant's application under Order VII, Rule 11, and rendered other applications infructuous. The question of execution under the Delhi Apartments Ownership Act, 1986, was left open as it was not urged by the plaintiff. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297665