<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1929 (3) TMI 9 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297663</link>
    <description>Attachment creates custodial rights and an execution remedy but does not itself create a proprietary charge or convert an attaching creditor into a secured creditor entitled to priority; consequently attachment alone does not confer secured-creditor status. Where execution proceedings are pending on a winding up, the attaching creditor must obtain leave to proceed under the Companies Act and submit to any court-imposed terms; permitting execution to be disposed of and the Nazir to deliver possession to the liquidator without seeking or obtaining leave ordinarily extinguishes the attaching creditor&#039;s remedy in the winding up and precludes a claim to secured priority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 1929 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2021 14:21:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1929 (3) TMI 9 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297663</link>
      <description>Attachment creates custodial rights and an execution remedy but does not itself create a proprietary charge or convert an attaching creditor into a secured creditor entitled to priority; consequently attachment alone does not confer secured-creditor status. Where execution proceedings are pending on a winding up, the attaching creditor must obtain leave to proceed under the Companies Act and submit to any court-imposed terms; permitting execution to be disposed of and the Nazir to deliver possession to the liquidator without seeking or obtaining leave ordinarily extinguishes the attaching creditor&#039;s remedy in the winding up and precludes a claim to secured priority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 1929 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>