https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412386 Section 9(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act was construed to mean that a court "entertains" an interim relief application when it takes it up for consideration and applies judicial mind, not only when it finally pronounces order. That bar operates at the stage of deciding whether to consider a fresh Section 9 request after constitution of the arbitral tribunal. Where a Section 9 application had already been fully heard and reserved for orders before the tribunal was constituted, the court was not required to reassess the adequacy of Section 17 relief or relegate the parties to the tribunal. The pending interim applications could proceed to final adjudication. en-us Tue, 14 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:06:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412386 Section 9(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act was construed to mean that a court "entertains" an interim relief application when it takes it up for consideration and applies judicial mind, not only when it finally pronounces order. That bar operates at the stage of deciding whether to consider a fresh Section 9 request after constitution of the arbitral tribunal. Where a Section 9 application had already been fully heard and reserved for orders before the tribunal was constituted, the court was not required to reassess the adequacy of Section 17 relief or relegate the parties to the tribunal. The pending interim applications could proceed to final adjudication. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 14 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412386