<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (7) TMI 22 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26594</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. The expenses incurred for constructing a loft in leased premises were treated as revenue expenditure rather than capital expenditure, as they aimed at improving business efficiency. Additionally, the tea expenses were not disallowable under the Income-tax Act, as they were not considered entertainment expenditure. The court referenced relevant precedents to support its decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 12:32:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (7) TMI 22 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26594</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. The expenses incurred for constructing a loft in leased premises were treated as revenue expenditure rather than capital expenditure, as they aimed at improving business efficiency. Additionally, the tea expenses were not disallowable under the Income-tax Act, as they were not considered entertainment expenditure. The court referenced relevant precedents to support its decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>