https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412381 The court allowed the respondents' application under Article 226(3) of the Constitution, modifying the interim order to require the petitioner to furnish a bank guarantee as per Section 67(6) of the CGST Act, 2017 and Rule 140 of the CGST Rules, 2017 for the release of seized goods. The observations were confined to the application's disposal and would not affect the final writ petition outcome. The stay application was disposed of accordingly. en-us Tue, 14 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Mar 2025 11:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412381 The court allowed the respondents' application under Article 226(3) of the Constitution, modifying the interim order to require the petitioner to furnish a bank guarantee as per Section 67(6) of the CGST Act, 2017 and Rule 140 of the CGST Rules, 2017 for the release of seized goods. The observations were confined to the application's disposal and would not affect the final writ petition outcome. The stay application was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws GST Tue, 14 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412381