<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 724 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412379</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking to quash a seizure order and notice under the U.P. GST Act 2017, citing a Supreme Court order deeming similar writ petitions disposed of to prevent legal inconsistencies and multiple appeals. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue the statutory appeal remedy in adherence to the law, as the matter had been concluded based on the Supreme Court&#039;s directive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 724 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412379</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking to quash a seizure order and notice under the U.P. GST Act 2017, citing a Supreme Court order deeming similar writ petitions disposed of to prevent legal inconsistencies and multiple appeals. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue the statutory appeal remedy in adherence to the law, as the matter had been concluded based on the Supreme Court&#039;s directive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>