https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412376 Disputed objections as to timely presentation of the cheque and other factual defences in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act prosecution are matters for trial, not for determination while considering interference under Section 482 CrPC. At the stage of summoning or rejection of discharge, the court is concerned only with whether a prima facie case exists. As the impugned order disclosed no legal infirmity, no inherent jurisdictional interference was warranted. The challenge to the rejection of discharge therefore failed, and the prosecution was left to proceed in accordance with law. en-us Wed, 08 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:06:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412376 Disputed objections as to timely presentation of the cheque and other factual defences in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act prosecution are matters for trial, not for determination while considering interference under Section 482 CrPC. At the stage of summoning or rejection of discharge, the court is concerned only with whether a prima facie case exists. As the impugned order disclosed no legal infirmity, no inherent jurisdictional interference was warranted. The challenge to the rejection of discharge therefore failed, and the prosecution was left to proceed in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 08 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412376