https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412367 The court directed respondent No.8/CBDT to consider and dispose of the representations made by the petitioner regarding Section 194-O of the Income Tax Act within six weeks. The court instructed a reasoned order addressing the petitioner's contentions to be passed, with communication of the decision within one week. The petitioner was required to continue depositing TDS in the interim without default. The judgment highlighted the need to address practical challenges faced by e-commerce operators in tax compliance, granting the petitioner liberty to seek further relief if dissatisfied with the decision on their representations. en-us Wed, 25 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:05:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412367 The court directed respondent No.8/CBDT to consider and dispose of the representations made by the petitioner regarding Section 194-O of the Income Tax Act within six weeks. The court instructed a reasoned order addressing the petitioner's contentions to be passed, with communication of the decision within one week. The petitioner was required to continue depositing TDS in the interim without default. The judgment highlighted the need to address practical challenges faced by e-commerce operators in tax compliance, granting the petitioner liberty to seek further relief if dissatisfied with the decision on their representations. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 25 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412367