<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 701 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412356</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by deleting the addition under section 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Income Tax Act due to the 10% margin difference rule. However, it upheld the disallowance of deductions for development charges and bank interest while calculating long-term capital gain. The interest charged under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was considered consequential and not separately adjudicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 701 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412356</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by deleting the addition under section 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Income Tax Act due to the 10% margin difference rule. However, it upheld the disallowance of deductions for development charges and bank interest while calculating long-term capital gain. The interest charged under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was considered consequential and not separately adjudicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>