<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 695 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412350</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the denial of Cenvat credit on imported Box Strapping Machines. It clarified the correct classification under Chapter 84, confirming the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the credit. The demand under Section 11D for excise duty was also dismissed, along with any consequential interest and penalty, as the credit was used for duty payment on machine clearance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 695 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412350</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the denial of Cenvat credit on imported Box Strapping Machines. It clarified the correct classification under Chapter 84, confirming the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the credit. The demand under Section 11D for excise duty was also dismissed, along with any consequential interest and penalty, as the credit was used for duty payment on machine clearance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>