https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412342 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the demand for central excise duty on Di-calcium phosphate (animal feed grade) was not valid for the disputed period. The product was classified under Heading 2835 and was exempt from duty under Notification 4/2016-CE(NT) dated 12.2.2016. The Tribunal emphasized the correct interpretation and application of exemption notifications in determining the liability for central excise duty. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, with any necessary consequential reliefs granted. en-us Tue, 24 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Aug 2022 12:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412342 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the demand for central excise duty on Di-calcium phosphate (animal feed grade) was not valid for the disputed period. The product was classified under Heading 2835 and was exempt from duty under Notification 4/2016-CE(NT) dated 12.2.2016. The Tribunal emphasized the correct interpretation and application of exemption notifications in determining the liability for central excise duty. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, with any necessary consequential reliefs granted. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 24 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412342