<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1273 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297654</link>
    <description>The court granted ad interim relief in favor of the Plaintiff, including injunctions against disposing of properties, disclosure of assets by defendants, and a direction for Defendant No. 20 to deposit a specified amount in court. The court emphasized the importance of protecting the Plaintiff&#039;s rights and preventing prejudice. The issue of maintainability due to the arbitration agreement was deferred for future consideration based on relevant applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:02:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1273 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297654</link>
      <description>The court granted ad interim relief in favor of the Plaintiff, including injunctions against disposing of properties, disclosure of assets by defendants, and a direction for Defendant No. 20 to deposit a specified amount in court. The court emphasized the importance of protecting the Plaintiff&#039;s rights and preventing prejudice. The issue of maintainability due to the arbitration agreement was deferred for future consideration based on relevant applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>