https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412309 In an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC arising from alleged non-compliance with an undertaking concerning detained goods, the Court considered the applicant's role, the delay in lodging the FIR, the custody of relevant documents with the investigating agency, and the need for custodial interrogation. As the documents were already with the investigating officer, the applicant had cooperated with the investigation, and the FIR was lodged more than four years after the events, the Court found custodial interrogation unnecessary at that stage. Anticipatory bail was granted subject to conditions. en-us Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Sep 2021 09:01:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412309 In an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC arising from alleged non-compliance with an undertaking concerning detained goods, the Court considered the applicant's role, the delay in lodging the FIR, the custody of relevant documents with the investigating agency, and the need for custodial interrogation. As the documents were already with the investigating officer, the applicant had cooperated with the investigation, and the FIR was lodged more than four years after the events, the Court found custodial interrogation unnecessary at that stage. Anticipatory bail was granted subject to conditions. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412309