<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 646 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412301</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Vivo Mobile was eligible for a reduced Additional Duty rate, as conditions were met. Refund applications were deemed maintainable without modification of assessment orders, allowing amendments under sections 149 and 154. However, due to unjust enrichment concerns, the refund amount was directed to the Consumer Welfare Fund. The Tribunal instructed prompt processing of any future refund applications and amendments to bills of entry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2021 09:01:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 646 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412301</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Vivo Mobile was eligible for a reduced Additional Duty rate, as conditions were met. Refund applications were deemed maintainable without modification of assessment orders, allowing amendments under sections 149 and 154. However, due to unjust enrichment concerns, the refund amount was directed to the Consumer Welfare Fund. The Tribunal instructed prompt processing of any future refund applications and amendments to bills of entry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>